postgresql 中的 like 查询优化方案

(编辑：jimmy 日期: 2024/12/24 浏览：2)

当时数量量比较庞大的时候，做模糊查询效率很慢，为了优化查询效率，尝试如下方法做效率对比

一、对比情况说明：

1、数据量100w条数据

2、执行sql

二、对比结果

explain analyze SELECT
 c_patent,
 c_applyissno,
 d_applyissdate,
 d_applydate,
 c_patenttype_dimn,
 c_newlawstatus,
 c_abstract 
FROM
 public.t_knowl_patent_zlxx_temp 
WHERE
 c_applicant LIKE '%本溪满族自治县连山关镇安平安养殖场%';

1、未建索时执行计划：

"Gather (cost=1000.00..83803.53 rows=92 width=1278) (actual time=217.264..217.264 rows=0 loops=1)
 Workers Planned: 2
 Workers Launched: 2
 -> Parallel Seq Scan on t_knowl_patent_zlxx (cost=0.00..82794.33 rows=38 width=1278) (actual time=212.355..212.355 rows=0 loops=3)
  Filter: ((c_applicant)::text ~~ '%本溪满族自治县连山关镇安平安养殖场%'::text)
  Rows Removed by Filter: 333333
Planning time: 0.272 ms
Execution time: 228.116 ms"

2、btree索引

建索引语句

CREATE INDEX idx_public_t_knowl_patent_zlxx_applicant ON public.t_knowl_patent_zlxx(c_applicant varchar_pattern_ops);

执行计划

"Gather (cost=1000.00..83803.53 rows=92 width=1278) (actual time=208.253..208.253 rows=0 loops=1)
 Workers Planned: 2
 Workers Launched: 2
 -> Parallel Seq Scan on t_knowl_patent_zlxx (cost=0.00..82794.33 rows=38 width=1278) (actual time=203.573..203.573 rows=0 loops=3)
  Filter: ((c_applicant)::text ~~ '%本溪满族自治县连山关镇安平安养殖场%'::text)
  Rows Removed by Filter: 333333
Planning time: 0.116 ms
Execution time: 218.189 ms"

但是如果将查询sql稍微改动一下，把like查询中的前置%去掉是这样的

Index Scan using idx_public_t_knowl_patent_zlxx_applicant on t_knowl_patent_zlxx_temp (cost=0.55..8.57 rows=92 width=1278) (actual time=0.292..0.292 rows=0 loops=1)
 Index Cond: (((c_applicant)::text ~>=~ '本溪满族自治县连山关镇安平安养殖场'::text) AND ((c_applicant)::text ~<~ '本溪满族自治县连山关镇安平安养殖圻'::text))
 Filter: ((c_applicant)::text ~~ '本溪满族自治县连山关镇安平安养殖场%'::text)
Planning time: 0.710 ms
Execution time: 0.378 ms

3、gin索引

创建索引语句(postgresql要求在9.6版本及以上)

create extension pg_trgm;
CREATE INDEX idx_public_t_knowl_patent_zlxx_applicant ON public.t_knowl_patent_zlxx USING gin (c_applicant gin_trgm_ops);

执行计划

Bitmap Heap Scan on t_knowl_patent_zlxx (cost=244.71..600.42 rows=91 width=1268) (actual time=0.649..0.649 rows=0 loops=1)
 Recheck Cond: ((c_applicant)::text ~~ '%本溪满族自治县连山关镇安平安养殖场%'::text)
 -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx_public_t_knowl_patent_zlxx_applicant (cost=0.00..244.69 rows=91 width=0) (actual time=0.647..0.647 rows=0 loops=1)
  Index Cond: ((c_applicant)::text ~~ '%本溪满族自治县连山关镇安平安养殖场%'::text)
Planning time: 0.673 ms
Execution time: 0.740 ms

三、结论

btree索引可以让后置% "abc%"的模糊匹配走索引，gin + gp_trgm可以让前后置% "%abc%" 走索引。但是gin 索引也有弊端，以下情况可能导致无法命中：

搜索字段少于3个字符时，不会命中索引，这是gin自身机制导致。

当搜索字段过长时，比如email检索，可能也不会命中索引，造成原因暂时未知。

补充：PostgreSQL LIKE 查询效率提升实验

一、未做索引的查询效率

作为对比，先对未索引的查询做测试

EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author = '曹志耘';
             QUERY PLAN             
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on gallery_map (cost=0.00..7002.32 rows=1025 width=621) (actual time=0.011..39.753 rows=1031 loops=1)
 Filter: ((author)::text = '曹志耘'::text)
 Rows Removed by Filter: 71315
 Planning time: 0.194 ms
 Execution time: 39.879 ms
(5 rows)
 
Time: 40.599 ms
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author like '曹志耘';
             QUERY PLAN             
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on gallery_map (cost=0.00..7002.32 rows=1025 width=621) (actual time=0.017..41.513 rows=1031 loops=1)
 Filter: ((author)::text ~~ '曹志耘'::text)
 Rows Removed by Filter: 71315
 Planning time: 0.188 ms
 Execution time: 41.669 ms
(5 rows)
 
Time: 42.457 ms
 
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author like '曹志耘%';
             QUERY PLAN             
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on gallery_map (cost=0.00..7002.32 rows=1028 width=621) (actual time=0.017..41.492 rows=1031 loops=1)
 Filter: ((author)::text ~~ '曹志耘%'::text)
 Rows Removed by Filter: 71315
 Planning time: 0.307 ms
 Execution time: 41.633 ms
(5 rows)
 
Time: 42.676 ms

很显然都会做全表扫描

二、创建btree索引

PostgreSQL默认索引是btree

CREATE INDEX ix_gallery_map_author ON gallery_map (author);
 
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author = '曹志耘';  
                QUERY PLAN                
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Bitmap Heap Scan on gallery_map (cost=36.36..2715.37 rows=1025 width=621) (actual time=0.457..1.312 rows=1031 loops=1)
 Recheck Cond: ((author)::text = '曹志耘'::text)
 Heap Blocks: exact=438
 -> Bitmap Index Scan on ix_gallery_map_author (cost=0.00..36.10 rows=1025 width=0) (actual time=0.358..0.358 rows=1031 loops=1)
   Index Cond: ((author)::text = '曹志耘'::text)
 Planning time: 0.416 ms
 Execution time: 1.422 ms
(7 rows)
 
Time: 2.462 ms
 
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author like '曹志耘';
                QUERY PLAN                
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Bitmap Heap Scan on gallery_map (cost=36.36..2715.37 rows=1025 width=621) (actual time=0.752..2.119 rows=1031 loops=1)
 Filter: ((author)::text ~~ '曹志耘'::text)
 Heap Blocks: exact=438
 -> Bitmap Index Scan on ix_gallery_map_author (cost=0.00..36.10 rows=1025 width=0) (actual time=0.560..0.560 rows=1031 loops=1)
   Index Cond: ((author)::text = '曹志耘'::text)
 Planning time: 0.270 ms
 Execution time: 2.295 ms
(7 rows)
 
Time: 3.444 ms
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author like '曹志耘%';
             QUERY PLAN             
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on gallery_map (cost=0.00..7002.32 rows=1028 width=621) (actual time=0.015..41.389 rows=1031 loops=1)
 Filter: ((author)::text ~~ '曹志耘%'::text)
 Rows Removed by Filter: 71315
 Planning time: 0.260 ms
 Execution time: 41.518 ms
(5 rows)
 
Time: 42.430 ms
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author like '%研究室';
             QUERY PLAN             
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on gallery_map (cost=0.00..7002.32 rows=2282 width=621) (actual time=0.064..52.824 rows=2152 loops=1)
 Filter: ((author)::text ~~ '%研究室'::text)
 Rows Removed by Filter: 70194
 Planning time: 0.254 ms
 Execution time: 53.064 ms
(5 rows)
 
Time: 53.954 ms

可以看到，等于、like的全匹配是用到索引的，like的模糊查询还是全表扫描

三、创建gin索引

CREATE EXTENSION pg_trgm;
 
CREATE INDEX ix_gallery_map_author ON gallery_map USING gin (author gin_trgm_ops);
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author like '曹%'; 
                QUERY PLAN                
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Bitmap Heap Scan on gallery_map (cost=19.96..2705.69 rows=1028 width=621) (actual time=0.419..1.771 rows=1031 loops=1)
 Recheck Cond: ((author)::text ~~ '曹%'::text)
 Heap Blocks: exact=438
 -> Bitmap Index Scan on ix_gallery_map_author (cost=0.00..19.71 rows=1028 width=0) (actual time=0.312..0.312 rows=1031 loops=1)
   Index Cond: ((author)::text ~~ '曹%'::text)
 Planning time: 0.358 ms
 Execution time: 1.916 ms
(7 rows)
 
Time: 2.843 ms
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author like '%耘%'; 
             QUERY PLAN             
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on gallery_map (cost=0.00..7002.32 rows=1028 width=621) (actual time=0.015..51.641 rows=1031 loops=1)
 Filter: ((author)::text ~~ '%耘%'::text)
 Rows Removed by Filter: 71315
 Planning time: 0.268 ms
 Execution time: 51.957 ms
(5 rows)
 
Time: 52.899 ms
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from gallery_map where author like '%研究室%';
                QUERY PLAN                
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Bitmap Heap Scan on gallery_map (cost=31.83..4788.42 rows=2559 width=621) (actual time=0.914..4.195 rows=2402 loops=1)
 Recheck Cond: ((author)::text ~~ '%研究室%'::text)
 Heap Blocks: exact=868
 -> Bitmap Index Scan on ix_gallery_map_author (cost=0.00..31.19 rows=2559 width=0) (actual time=0.694..0.694 rows=2402 loops=1)
   Index Cond: ((author)::text ~~ '%研究室%'::text)
 Planning time: 0.306 ms
 Execution time: 4.403 ms
(7 rows)
 
Time: 5.227 ms

gin_trgm索引的效果好多了

由于pg_trgm的索引是把字符串切成多个3元组，然后使用这些3元组做匹配，所以gin_trgm索引对于少于3个字符（包括汉字）的查询，只有前缀匹配会走索引

另外，还测试了btree_gin，效果和btree一样

注意：

gin_trgm要求数据库必须使用UTF-8编码

demo_v1 # \l demo_v1
        List of databases
 Name | Owner | Encoding | Collate | Ctype | Access privileges
---------+-----------+----------+-------------+-------------+-------------------
 demo_v1 | wmpp_user | UTF8  | en_US.UTF-8 | en_US.UTF-8 |

以上为个人经验，希望能给大家一个参考，也希望大家多多支持。如有错误或未考虑完全的地方，望不吝赐教。

上一篇：PostgreSQL存储过程循环调用方式
下一篇：postgresql 存储函数调用变量的3种方法小结

一句话新闻

一文看懂荣耀MagicBook Pro 16
荣耀猎人回归！七大亮点看懂不只是轻薄本，更是游戏本的MagicBook Pro 16.
人们对于笔记本电脑有一个固有印象：要么轻薄但性能一般，要么性能强劲但笨重臃肿。然而，今年荣耀新推出的MagicBook Pro 16刷新了人们的认知——发布会上，荣耀宣布猎人游戏本正式回归，称其继承了荣耀 HUNTER 基因，并自信地为其打出“轻薄本，更是游戏本”的口号。
众所周知，寻求轻薄本的用户普遍更看重便携性、外观造型、静谧性和打字办公等用机体验，而寻求游戏本的用户则普遍更看重硬件配置、性能释放等硬核指标。把两个看似难以相干的产品融合到一起，我们不禁对它产生了强烈的好奇：作为代表荣耀猎人游戏本的跨界新物种，它究竟做了哪些平衡以兼顾不同人群的各类需求呢？